Even in regulated markets, utilities face real consequences when their customer-facing digital platforms underperform. The issue with letting down customers isn’t about competition—it’s about drawing negative attention and regulatory oversight, public trust, operational costs, and the ability to meet broader strategic goals like demand-side management and infrastructure modernization.
Here are three recent real-world examples that illustrate the point.
In mid-2025, one of the largest investor owned utilities in the Western US introduced a new online account portal requiring customers to re-register and verify contact information. Some encountered login errors that temporarily blocked access to billing, payment, and outage alert tools. A small number even received incorrect service interruption notices.
The consequence:
Call center demand spiked as customers sought help with tasks they typically managed themselves. The situation drew media coverage, putting a public spotlight on what would otherwise be an internal IT transition. It’s a reminder that even short-term digital disruptions can become highly visible and costly when they touch core service functions.
A regulatory review in the UK found that some E.ON prepayment customers did not receive final bills or refunds promptly after account closure. Nearly 250,000 customers were affected, leading to more than £14 million in mandated compensation and refunds.
The consequence:
The regulatory review and intervention makes clear that accurate billing isn’t just a service expectation—it’s a compliance obligation. Reliable, user-friendly digital tools are a primary safeguard to ensure that all customers, especially vulnerable ones, have clear visibility into their account status and balances.
Following a merger, Greater Western Water in Australia introduced a new billing system. Some customers experienced delayed or incorrect bills and difficulty accessing account data online. Phone support wait times grew significantly during the transition, and the government requested a review.
The consequence:
When self-service options fail during system changes, operational costs climb, and customer frustration becomes a public matter. This is particularly risky during high-profile projects like mergers, system consolidations, or AMI deployments.
The Broader Priority for Regulated Utilities
While regulated status means customers can’t switch providers, it does not shield utilities from the negative effects of poor digital engagement:
Today’s grid challenges are real and we are feeling the impact of strained resources more and more. Peak demand volatility will only increase over time as will the need to integrate and manage distributed energy resources.
The industry’s weak digital baseline shows how widespread the risk is. According to the 2025 J.D. Power U.S. Utility Digital Experience Study, overall satisfaction with utility digital channels averages just 611 out of 1,000—well below industries like wealth management (738), insurance (698), and retirement services (703). Nearly one-third of utility sites fail basic usability, and more than a quarter don’t offer a mobile app at all.
All this adds up to make shortfalls like the case studies above more rule than exception. These long term trends and challenges require utilities to actively engage customers in managing usage. That’s not possible without:
In regulated utility markets, investing in these capabilities isn’t about outcompeting another provider—it’s about protecting operational integrity, meeting regulatory expectations, and maintaining public trust in an increasingly digital consumer landscape.
Most importantly, it’s about building the digital relationships with customers now, which will be crucial as power scarcity becomes a reality in more of the US. We’ll discuss that more in future articles.